VerifiedDR
Search and AI visibility platform with TrueDR, monitoring, and verified partnerships
A personal dashboard for an owned site is a weekend build with Search Console and model APIs, but TrueDR, backlink intelligence, historical monitoring, and the partner marketplace depend on paid data, operations, and a live network.
Build verification: not recorded. How we judge buildability
What you give up
- TrueDR and commercial backlink data
- exact ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode surfaces
- cross-site partner network and marketplace
- managed refresh jobs and alerts
- traffic estimates and competitor data
Why people still pay
They pay for verified backlink and traffic data, cross-model checks, historical monitoring, and a partner network without maintaining API integrations and scheduled jobs.
Your build guide
The stack, security requirements, and agent rules for a focused replacement.
Before you start
- A supported Node release, a writable local data directory and a separate backup location. Bind to localhost; remote use requires authentication and HTTPS first. Optional AI generation needs a provider key, a usage budget and approval to send the selected material. Verified Search Console access for the selected property and explicit permission to fetch its sitemap/pages.
- Implementation components: Node.js, TypeScript and Express with server-rendered HTML and small browser modules. SQLite through better-sqlite3 with migrations, prepared statements and a single background worker. A single provider SDK with a configured supported model, schema-validated responses and revisioned prompt templates. Google Search Console OAuth import, a bounded sitemap fetcher and immutable model-answer samples.
- Scope boundary: Backlink authority, rank guarantees and consumer-surface monitoring are not provided.
Use these project rules and optional skill references alongside the prompt. Review each skill before adding it to your agent; the AGENTS.md export includes the same guidance.
Optional external skill: copywriting — Write landing pages and product copy grounded in the intended audience, product value and a clear next action. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Optional external skill: web-design-guidelines — Review web interfaces for accessibility, keyboard focus, forms, navigation and interaction quality. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Optional external skill: sharp-edges — Review security-sensitive APIs and configuration for dangerous defaults and easy-to-misuse interfaces. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Project rule — data model: owned Search Console observations, query/page date windows, buyer-question samples and citation evidence
Project rule — preserve this invariant: API answer samples are not consumer-search visibility; delayed Search Console dates and failed samples are shown rather than scored as fresh zeros.
Project rule — acceptance evidence: A report with missing dates is marked incomplete; a suggested priority links to its actual query/page metrics or captured model answer.
Implementation plan
Phase 1
Scope and fixtures. Implement this bounded workflow: Import or fetch authorized Search Console reports for one site and run a small approved set of buyer questions against supported model APIs. Prioritize pages with transparent rules and keep the two evidence sources visibly distinct. Record prerequisites, select representative user-owned fixtures and document the unsupported features: Backlink authority, rank guarantees and consumer-surface monitoring are not provided.
Phase 2
Durable model. Model owned Search Console observations, query/page date windows, buyer-question samples and citation evidence Add migrations or a versioned document format, explicit validation, stable IDs and a visible import-error report. Preserve this rule: API answer samples are not consumer-search visibility; delayed Search Console dates and failed samples are shown rather than scored as fresh zeros.
Phase 3
Complete the first useful path. Implement the workflow's input, review and output interface, with clear controls and explicit empty/error states. Use short SQLite transactions and persist job state before starting work. Give retries stable operation IDs; report incomplete or unknown results instead of silently repeating them.
Phase 4
Permissions and integration failure. Reject unexpected origins and unbounded request bodies even on localhost. Keep credentials outside the database export and redact sensitive text from logs. Treat source documents as untrusted data, prevent them from changing tool permissions, and require review of factual claims before publication. Request integration credentials and permissions only for the enabled feature; show a disconnected state instead of mock results.
Phase 5
Portable handoff. Use a consistent SQLite backup and an attachment manifest. Export portable JSON/CSV, then restore to a new directory without overwriting the original data. Include setup, operating limits, fixture walkthrough and shutdown/restart instructions in the README.
Phase 6
Acceptance scenarios. A report with missing dates is marked incomplete; a suggested priority links to its actual query/page metrics or captured model answer. Repeat the workflow after restart and with a denied permission or unavailable dependency; show recoverable failure rather than a success placeholder.
WORKING SLICE Import or fetch authorized Search Console reports for one site and run a small approved set of buyer questions against supported model APIs. Prioritize pages with transparent rules and keep the two evidence sources visibly distinct. Build this scoped VerifiedDR-inspired workflow with a documented data model and visible failure states. Architecture - Node.js, TypeScript and Express with server-rendered HTML and small browser modules. - SQLite through better-sqlite3 with migrations, prepared statements and a single background worker. - A single provider SDK with a configured supported model, schema-validated responses and revisioned prompt templates. - Google Search Console OAuth import, a bounded sitemap fetcher and immutable model-answer samples. Prerequisites and limits A supported Node release, a writable local data directory and a separate backup location. Bind to localhost; remote use requires authentication and HTTPS first. Optional AI generation needs a provider key, a usage budget and approval to send the selected material. Verified Search Console access for the selected property and explicit permission to fetch its sitemap/pages. Outside this release: Backlink authority, rank guarantees and consumer-surface monitoring are not provided. Data model and correctness owned Search Console observations, query/page date windows, buyer-question samples and citation evidence Invariant: API answer samples are not consumer-search visibility; delayed Search Console dates and failed samples are shown rather than scored as fresh zeros. Use short SQLite transactions and persist job state before starting work. Give retries stable operation IDs; report incomplete or unknown results instead of silently repeating them. Security and privacy Reject unexpected origins and unbounded request bodies even on localhost. Keep credentials outside the database export and redact sensitive text from logs. Treat source documents as untrusted data, prevent them from changing tool permissions, and require review of factual claims before publication. Recovery and export Use a consistent SQLite backup and an attachment manifest. Export portable JSON/CSV, then restore to a new directory without overwriting the original data. Implementation order 1. Phase 1 — Scope and fixtures. Implement this bounded workflow: Import or fetch authorized Search Console reports for one site and run a small approved set of buyer questions against supported model APIs. Prioritize pages with transparent rules and keep the two evidence sources visibly distinct. Record prerequisites, select representative user-owned fixtures and document the unsupported features: Backlink authority, rank guarantees and consumer-surface monitoring are not provided. 2. Phase 2 — Durable model. Model owned Search Console observations, query/page date windows, buyer-question samples and citation evidence Add migrations or a versioned document format, explicit validation, stable IDs and a visible import-error report. Preserve this rule: API answer samples are not consumer-search visibility; delayed Search Console dates and failed samples are shown rather than scored as fresh zeros. 3. Phase 3 — Complete the first useful path. Implement the workflow's input, review and output interface, with clear controls and explicit empty/error states. Use short SQLite transactions and persist job state before starting work. Give retries stable operation IDs; report incomplete or unknown results instead of silently repeating them. 4. Phase 4 — Permissions and integration failure. Reject unexpected origins and unbounded request bodies even on localhost. Keep credentials outside the database export and redact sensitive text from logs. Treat source documents as untrusted data, prevent them from changing tool permissions, and require review of factual claims before publication. Request integration credentials and permissions only for the enabled feature; show a disconnected state instead of mock results. 5. Phase 5 — Portable handoff. Use a consistent SQLite backup and an attachment manifest. Export portable JSON/CSV, then restore to a new directory without overwriting the original data. Include setup, operating limits, fixture walkthrough and shutdown/restart instructions in the README. 6. Phase 6 — Acceptance scenarios. A report with missing dates is marked incomplete; a suggested priority links to its actual query/page metrics or captured model answer. Repeat the workflow after restart and with a denied permission or unavailable dependency; show recoverable failure rather than a success placeholder. Acceptance A report with missing dates is marked incomplete; a suggested priority links to its actual query/page metrics or captured model answer. Use real source data or clearly labeled fixtures. Explain unsupported input and provider failures; do not fabricate analytics, delivery receipts, accuracy claims or security guarantees. Optional agent guidance Optional external skill: [copywriting](https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/copywriting/SKILL.md) — Write landing pages and product copy grounded in the intended audience, product value and a clear next action. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission. Optional external skill: [web-design-guidelines](https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-skills/blob/main/skills/web-design-guidelines/SKILL.md) — Review web interfaces for accessibility, keyboard focus, forms, navigation and interaction quality. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission. Optional external skill: [sharp-edges](https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/main/plugins/sharp-edges/skills/sharp-edges/SKILL.md) — Review security-sensitive APIs and configuration for dangerous defaults and easy-to-misuse interfaces. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission. Project rule — data model: owned Search Console observations, query/page date windows, buyer-question samples and citation evidence Project rule — preserve this invariant: API answer samples are not consumer-search visibility; delayed Search Console dates and failed samples are shown rather than scored as fresh zeros. Project rule — acceptance evidence: A report with missing dates is marked incomplete; a suggested priority links to its actual query/page metrics or captured model answer.
$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter), copy the prompt or copy or download AGENTS.md
prompt copied. want to know what dies next week?
new verdicts + top votes, weekly. free. one-click out.
No prior-art project is listed yet. Compare the scoped build with the paid product before choosing.
VerifiedDR pricing
| plan | monthly | annual (per mo) | what you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| free | $0/workspace | $0/workspace | 1 AI scan total; 4 questions across 3 platforms; unlimited verified sites; 3 keywords/site; 2 link exchanges/month; 25 lifetime API calls. |
| pro | $39/workspace | $26/workspace | 25 prompts account-wide; 20 keywords/site; 20 link exchanges/month; 1,000 API calls.Annual plan charges for 8 months ($312/year). |
| max | $99/workspace | $66/workspace | 75 prompts account-wide; 50 keywords/site; 50 link exchanges/month; 5,000 API calls.Annual plan charges for 8 months ($792/year). |
| ultra | $199/workspace | $132.67/workspace | 200 prompts account-wide; 100 keywords/site; unlimited link exchanges; 10,000 API calls.Annual plan charges for 8 months ($1,592/year). |
| enterprise | — | — | Custom prompts, keywords, API volume, support, and partnership capacity.Contact sales. |
free tier1 AI scan total; 4 questions across 3 platforms; unlimited verified sites; 3 keywords/site; 2 link exchanges/month; 25 lifetime API calls
billingmonthly + annual (annual charges for 8 months, effectively 4 months free); cancel or switch anytime; tax may be added
hidden costsThe advertised 7-day trial costs $9 and is not free. Backlink packages and partnership services can add separate charges.
pricing sources checked 2026-08-14 · pricing source ↗
Questions about VerifiedDR
Can you build your own VerifiedDR with AI?
Partly. A personal dashboard for an owned site is a weekend build with Search Console and model APIs, but TrueDR, backlink intelligence, historical monitoring, and the partner marketplace depend on paid data, operations, and a live network.
What does the VerifiedDR build prompt cover?
The prompt starts with this scope: Import or fetch authorized Search Console reports for one site and run a small approved set of buyer questions against supported model APIs. Prioritize pages with transparent rules and keep the two evidence sources visibly distinct. Full-product capabilities excluded from the comparison include: TrueDR and commercial backlink data; exact ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode surfaces; cross-site partner network and marketplace. Follow the implementation plan and its prerequisites before expanding the build.
How do I use the prompt, AGENTS.md and agent skills?
Start with the VerifiedDR prerequisites and stack, then copy the prompt into your coding agent. Save the project rules as AGENTS.md in the project root. Linked skills are optional packages or source instructions for specific tasks; review their current contents and install only those matching the chosen stack. A skill does not supply API credentials or verify the finished app.
How long will this VerifiedDR project take?
The catalogue estimate is multi-day for the limited scope. Setup, integration approvals, debugging, deployment and ongoing maintenance can add time. This is an estimate, not a delivery guarantee.
What would I give up by replacing VerifiedDR?
TrueDR and commercial backlink data; exact ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode surfaces; cross-site partner network and marketplace; managed refresh jobs and alerts; traffic estimates and competitor data. They pay for verified backlink and traffic data, cross-model checks, historical monitoring, and a partner network without maintaining API integrations and scheduled jobs.
What price is this guide comparing against?
The recorded Pro plan is $39/mo (monthly), checked 2026-07-30. Check the linked pricing source before buying. Building your own also has hosting, API and maintenance costs; the recorded amount is not a guaranteed saving.
What can I use instead of building VerifiedDR?
No alternative is listed in this entry yet. That is a gap in this catalogue, not proof that no suitable product exists. Compare the paid product and the proposed scope before committing to a build.