diclip
Turns long recordings into ranked, captioned vertical clips worth posting
The core loop is genuinely one-shottable: transcribe, rank the strongest moments, cut vertical clips with burned captions. The gaps are execution and infra. Face-aware reframing with seat tracking, a full in-browser timeline editor, and a container-scale render pipeline are not a one-session build. A competent agent can produce a usable personal clipper quickly, but matching diclip's reframe quality and editing depth is a multi-day project.
Build verification: not recorded. How we judge buildability
What you give up
- face-aware vertical reframing with seat tracking
- full in-browser timeline editor with scenes, tracks, and effects
- container-scale render pipeline and yt-dlp import
- credit-based capacity model and priority processing
- ready-to-post hooks and confidence scoring polished for clips
Why people still pay
Creators pay to skip the editing grind: diclip reads the full transcript, explains why each clip was chosen, and opens a prepared edit. The reframe quality and editor depth are tuned over months, not a weekend, and the render pipeline just works on long sources.
Your build guide
The stack, security requirements, and agent rules for a focused replacement.
Before you start
- Runtime and tools: Python, FastAPI, SQLite, FFmpeg/ffprobe and a React review interface.
- Before starting: Installed FFmpeg/ffprobe, writable media storage and a short recording whose use is authorized.
Use these project rules and optional skill references alongside the prompt. Review each skill before adding it to your agent; the AGENTS.md export includes the same guidance.
Project rule — domain: Store SourceVideo, TranscriptSegment, ClipCandidate, CropTrack and CaptionRevision; retain source timestamps and reject clips with overlapping or reversed boundaries.
Project rule — scope and recovery: Begin with manual center/subject positioning and one vertical preset. Highlight scores rank candidates only; no guaranteed virality, perfect face tracking or automatic factual context.
Project rule — acceptance: Choose a highlight beginning mid-sentence, extend it to include context and render a two-speaker segment; preview exposes cropped faces and caption timing before export.
Project rule — delivery: document real setup commands and permissions; do not claim a build, accuracy level, performance result or security certification that has not been demonstrated.
Recommended skill: modern-python — structure the Python worker or explicitly optional read-only utility with pinned dependencies, typed boundaries and clear failure handling. Follow the maintainer's installation instructions and match its requirements to the chosen runtime.
Recommended skill: vercel-react-best-practices — keep the proposed React work/review views responsive and avoid unnecessary rendering or data-fetch waterfalls. Follow the maintainer's installation instructions and match its requirements to the chosen runtime.
Implementation plan
Phase 1
Pin the working slice and create its example input: Transcribe one long video, propose standalone clip ranges, let the editor refine boundaries and render vertical clips with reviewed captions. Confirm setup: Installed FFmpeg/ffprobe, writable media storage and a short recording whose use is authorized.
Phase 2
Implement persistence and write-time invariants before decorating the UI: Store SourceVideo, TranscriptSegment, ClipCandidate, CropTrack and CaptionRevision; retain source timestamps and reject clips with overlapping or reversed boundaries.
Phase 3
Connect the working view to real saved state. Keep source files immutable and store edit decisions separately. Run media tools with argument arrays, bounded file size/runtime and unique job directories; only rename a completed export into its final location.
Phase 4
Expose the app-specific limits and recovery path in context: Begin with manual center/subject positioning and one vertical preset. Highlight scores rank candidates only; no guaranteed virality, perfect face tracking or automatic factual context.
Phase 5
Walk through this concrete acceptance case and preserve its exported evidence: Choose a highlight beginning mid-sentence, extend it to include context and render a two-speaker segment; preview exposes cropped faces and caption timing before export. Finish the README and backup/restore instructions; report unfinished capabilities explicitly.
Build the following focused alternative to diclip. This is a deliberately limited personal or small-team substitute, not parity with the paid service. WORKING SLICE Transcribe one long video, propose standalone clip ranges, let the editor refine boundaries and render vertical clips with reviewed captions. SETUP AND ARCHITECTURE Use Python, FastAPI, SQLite, FFmpeg/ffprobe and a React review interface. Prerequisites: Installed FFmpeg/ffprobe, writable media storage and a short recording whose use is authorized. Before integrating anything, record actual versions and permissions, plus model files or provider limits only where used, in the README; make unavailable dependencies visible rather than simulating success. DOMAIN MODEL AND INVARIANTS Store SourceVideo, TranscriptSegment, ClipCandidate, CropTrack and CaptionRevision; retain source timestamps and reject clips with overlapping or reversed boundaries. IMPLEMENTATION CONTRACT Keep source files immutable and store edit decisions separately. Run media tools with argument arrays, bounded file size/runtime and unique job directories; only rename a completed export into its final location. Provide an input/setup view, the main work view, and a review/export view appropriate to this workflow. Preserve the last saved state if a job or save fails. Include empty, loading, permission-denied, partial and retryable-error states. Log identifiers and error categories without secret values or unnecessary private content. APP-SPECIFIC BOUNDARY AND RECOVERY Begin with manual center/subject positioning and one vertical preset. Highlight scores rank candidates only; no guaranteed virality, perfect face tracking or automatic factual context. ACCEPTANCE SCENARIO Choose a highlight beginning mid-sentence, extend it to include context and render a two-speaker segment; preview exposes cropped faces and caption timing before export. Also reopen the app after an interrupted operation, confirm the saved record/export remains inspectable, and document the recovery action. These are implementation acceptance requirements, not a claim that this guide has been tested. DELIVERY Deliver a runnable repository with migrations or project-format versioning, a non-sensitive example, environment/permission setup, the exact manual acceptance steps, and a backup/export-and-restore walkthrough. Implement the working slice before optional integrations; list any deferred paid-product capabilities honestly. Do not add capabilities outside the working slice just to resemble the original product. PROJECT RULES FOR AGENTS.md Keep the domain invariants above executable at the write boundary. Propose scope changes before adding providers or permissions. Never fabricate source evidence, publish results, identity matches or successful delivery. Preserve user originals and require an explicit confirmation for destructive changes or external publication.
$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter), copy the prompt or copy or download AGENTS.md
prompt copied. want to know what dies next week?
new verdicts + top votes, weekly. free. one-click out.
No prior-art project is listed yet. Compare the scoped build with the paid product before choosing.
diclip pricing
| plan | monthly | annual (per mo) | what you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| free | $0/workspace | $0/workspace | 3 clips once; 1 source-hour total; 60 min per source upload capOne-time, does not renew. |
| starter | $2/workspace | — | 30 clips/mo; 2.5 source-hours/mo; 90 min per sourceIDR 39.000/month, converted. |
| creator | $6/workspace | — | 60 clips/mo; 5.75 source-hours/mo; 120 min per sourceIDR 89.000/month, converted. |
| studio | $11/workspace | — | 120 clips/mo; 11 source-hours/mo; 120 min per source; priority processingIDR 169.000/month, converted. |
free tier3 clips once, 1 source-hour total, 60 min upload cap
billingmonthly or prepaid 3/12 months (IDR, charged in full; capacity resets monthly)
hidden costsTop-up packs (one-time, active subscription required) for extra source minutes and clips.
pricing sources checked 2026-08-16 · pricing source ↗
Questions about diclip
Can you build your own diclip with AI?
Partly. The core loop is genuinely one-shottable: transcribe, rank the strongest moments, cut vertical clips with burned captions. The gaps are execution and infra. Face-aware reframing with seat tracking, a full in-browser timeline editor, and a container-scale render pipeline are not a one-session build. A competent agent can produce a usable personal clipper quickly, but matching diclip's reframe quality and editing depth is a multi-day project.
What does the diclip build prompt cover?
The prompt starts with this scope: Transcribe one long video, propose standalone clip ranges, let the editor refine boundaries and render vertical clips with reviewed captions. Full-product capabilities excluded from the comparison include: face-aware vertical reframing with seat tracking; full in-browser timeline editor with scenes, tracks, and effects; container-scale render pipeline and yt-dlp import. Follow the implementation plan and its prerequisites before expanding the build.
How do I use the prompt, AGENTS.md and agent skills?
Start with the diclip prerequisites and stack, then copy the prompt into your coding agent. Save the project rules as AGENTS.md in the project root. Linked skills are optional packages or source instructions for specific tasks; review their current contents and install only those matching the chosen stack. A skill does not supply API credentials or verify the finished app.
How long will this diclip project take?
The catalogue estimate is multi-day for the limited scope. Setup, integration approvals, debugging, deployment and ongoing maintenance can add time. This is an estimate, not a delivery guarantee.
What would I give up by replacing diclip?
face-aware vertical reframing with seat tracking; full in-browser timeline editor with scenes, tracks, and effects; container-scale render pipeline and yt-dlp import; credit-based capacity model and priority processing; ready-to-post hooks and confidence scoring polished for clips. Creators pay to skip the editing grind: diclip reads the full transcript, explains why each clip was chosen, and opens a prepared edit. The reframe quality and editor depth are tuned over months, not a weekend, and the render pipeline just works on long sources.
What price is this guide comparing against?
The recorded Creator plan is $6/mo (monthly, or prepaid 3 or 12 months), checked 2026-08-16. Check the linked pricing source before buying. Building your own also has hosting, API and maintenance costs; the recorded amount is not a guaranteed saving.
What can I use instead of building diclip?
No alternative is listed in this entry yet. That is a gap in this catalogue, not proof that no suitable product exists. Compare the paid product and the proposed scope before committing to a build.