Coda

Doc platform that combines writing, tables, automations, and small apps

KINDA · partial replacement
price $12/mo per seatsubscription / year $144estimated build time multi-dayreplaced by 0 people

A doc with tables and buttons is buildable; Coda's editor, formula engine, packs/integrations, permissions, and team workflows make full parity difficult.

Build verification: not recorded. How we judge buildability

What you give up

  • formula language
  • packs
  • permissions
  • automations
  • templates
  • collaboration
  • doc-app UX

Why people still pay

They pay because docs become tools that teammates can understand and maintain.

Your build guide

The stack, security requirements, and agent rules for a focused replacement.

Before you start

  • A supported Node release, PostgreSQL, HTTPS for a shared deployment, and a backup destination. Begin with one workspace and explicit owner/member permissions.
  • Implementation components: Next.js App Router and TypeScript for server-rendered pages and validated mutations. PostgreSQL with Drizzle migrations; Better Auth sessions for a small private workspace.
  • Scope boundary: formula language; packs
01
Next.js App Router and TypeScript for server-rendered pages and validated mutations.
02
PostgreSQL with Drizzle migrations; Better Auth sessions for a small private workspace.
03
Domain model: documents, blocks, typed tables, relation IDs, formula ASTs, computed values and button execution logs
engineering roadmap

Implementation plan

1

Phase 1

Scope and fixtures. Implement this bounded workflow: Build a document with embedded typed tables, simple relation lookups and a small formula language. Add a button that performs one permission-checked mutation with a preview. Record prerequisites, select representative user-owned fixtures and document the unsupported features: formula language; packs

2

Phase 2

Durable model. Model documents, blocks, typed tables, relation IDs, formula ASTs, computed values and button execution logs Add migrations or a versioned document format, explicit validation, stable IDs and a visible import-error report. Preserve this rule: Never evaluate formulas as JavaScript; detect dependency cycles, bound evaluation cost and preserve raw values when formula evaluation fails.

3

Phase 3

Complete the first useful path. Implement the workflow's input, review and output interface, with clear controls and explicit empty/error states. Commit related database changes in one transaction. Use version checks for competing edits and an outbox for external notifications; retry delivery independently of saving the record.

4

Phase 4

Permissions and integration failure. Authorize every record read and mutation on the server using its workspace membership; validate payloads, protect mutations against CSRF, and escape user-authored HTML. Request integration credentials and permissions only for the enabled feature; show a disconnected state instead of mock results.

5

Phase 5

Portable handoff. Export versioned JSON plus attachments and a readable CSV summary. Restore into a separate database and compare record IDs and attachment checksums before switching. Include setup, operating limits, fixture walkthrough and shutdown/restart instructions in the README.

6

Phase 6

Acceptance scenarios. A cyclic formula displays an error without freezing the document; pressing an action button twice with the same operation ID records one mutation. Repeat the workflow after restart and with a denied permission or unavailable dependency; show recoverable failure rather than a success placeholder.

the pro prompt
download AGENTS.md
WORKING SLICE
Build a document with embedded typed tables, simple relation lookups and a small formula language. Add a button that performs one permission-checked mutation with a preview.

Build this scoped Coda-inspired workflow with a documented data model and visible failure states.

Architecture
- Next.js App Router and TypeScript for server-rendered pages and validated mutations.
- PostgreSQL with Drizzle migrations; Better Auth sessions for a small private workspace.

Prerequisites and limits
A supported Node release, PostgreSQL, HTTPS for a shared deployment, and a backup destination. Begin with one workspace and explicit owner/member permissions.
Outside this release: formula language; packs

Data model and correctness
documents, blocks, typed tables, relation IDs, formula ASTs, computed values and button execution logs
Invariant: Never evaluate formulas as JavaScript; detect dependency cycles, bound evaluation cost and preserve raw values when formula evaluation fails.
Commit related database changes in one transaction. Use version checks for competing edits and an outbox for external notifications; retry delivery independently of saving the record.

Security and privacy
Authorize every record read and mutation on the server using its workspace membership; validate payloads, protect mutations against CSRF, and escape user-authored HTML.

Recovery and export
Export versioned JSON plus attachments and a readable CSV summary. Restore into a separate database and compare record IDs and attachment checksums before switching.

Implementation order
1. Phase 1 — Scope and fixtures. Implement this bounded workflow: Build a document with embedded typed tables, simple relation lookups and a small formula language. Add a button that performs one permission-checked mutation with a preview. Record prerequisites, select representative user-owned fixtures and document the unsupported features: formula language; packs
2. Phase 2 — Durable model. Model documents, blocks, typed tables, relation IDs, formula ASTs, computed values and button execution logs Add migrations or a versioned document format, explicit validation, stable IDs and a visible import-error report. Preserve this rule: Never evaluate formulas as JavaScript; detect dependency cycles, bound evaluation cost and preserve raw values when formula evaluation fails.
3. Phase 3 — Complete the first useful path. Implement the workflow's input, review and output interface, with clear controls and explicit empty/error states. Commit related database changes in one transaction. Use version checks for competing edits and an outbox for external notifications; retry delivery independently of saving the record.
4. Phase 4 — Permissions and integration failure. Authorize every record read and mutation on the server using its workspace membership; validate payloads, protect mutations against CSRF, and escape user-authored HTML. Request integration credentials and permissions only for the enabled feature; show a disconnected state instead of mock results.
5. Phase 5 — Portable handoff. Export versioned JSON plus attachments and a readable CSV summary. Restore into a separate database and compare record IDs and attachment checksums before switching. Include setup, operating limits, fixture walkthrough and shutdown/restart instructions in the README.
6. Phase 6 — Acceptance scenarios. A cyclic formula displays an error without freezing the document; pressing an action button twice with the same operation ID records one mutation. Repeat the workflow after restart and with a denied permission or unavailable dependency; show recoverable failure rather than a success placeholder.

Acceptance
A cyclic formula displays an error without freezing the document; pressing an action button twice with the same operation ID records one mutation.
Use real source data or clearly labeled fixtures. Explain unsupported input and provider failures; do not fabricate analytics, delivery receipts, accuracy claims or security guarantees.

Optional agent guidance
Optional external skill: [vercel-react-best-practices](https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-skills/blob/main/skills/react-best-practices/SKILL.md) — Improve React and Next.js data fetching, rendering, bundle size and server performance. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Optional external skill: [supabase-postgres-best-practices](https://github.com/supabase/agent-skills/blob/main/skills/supabase-postgres-best-practices/SKILL.md) — Review PostgreSQL schemas, queries, indexes, pooling, concurrency and row-level security. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Optional external skill: [web-design-guidelines](https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-skills/blob/main/skills/web-design-guidelines/SKILL.md) — Review web interfaces for accessibility, keyboard focus, forms, navigation and interaction quality. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Project rule — data model: documents, blocks, typed tables, relation IDs, formula ASTs, computed values and button execution logs
Project rule — preserve this invariant: Never evaluate formulas as JavaScript; detect dependency cycles, bound evaluation cost and preserve raw values when formula evaluation fails.
Project rule — acceptance evidence: A cyclic formula displays an error without freezing the document; pressing an action button twice with the same operation ID records one mutation.

$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter), copy the prompt or copy or download AGENTS.md

share on X ↗

Alternatives to building your own

Fibery FreeCoda for ten people, with relational docs and 250 automations before the bill exists.$0free↗Superhuman Docs FreeCoda is now Superhuman Docs; the free plan still has collaborative docs, connected tables, forms, formulas, and automations.$0free↗

no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real

Coda pricing

planmonthlyannual (per mo)what you get
free$0/workspace$0/workspacePersonal docs have no object/page cap; shared docs cap at 50 objects and 1,000 rows; 1 GB attachments/doc, 10 MB/file, 7-day history, 35 time + 100 event automations/doc/month, 100 rows/sync table
pro$15/user$12/userPer Doc Maker; unlimited doc size; 5 GB attachments/doc, 250 MB/file, 30-day history, 100 time + 500 event automations/doc/month, 2,000 AI credits/Doc Maker/month, 10,000 rows/sync table
business$40/user$33/userPer Doc Maker; unlimited attachments/doc and history; 250 MB/file; unlimited automations; 6,000 AI credits/Doc Maker/month; 10,000 rows/sync tableThe current pricing page calls this Business; some help-center quota tables still call it Team.
enterprise——Custom contract; 12,000 AI credits/Doc Maker/month; unlimited attachments/doc, history and automations; 250 MB/file

free tierPersonal docs have no object/page cap; shared docs: 50 objects and 1,000 rows; 1 GB attachments/doc, 10 MB/file, 7-day history, 35 time + 100 event automations/doc/month, 100 rows/sync table

billingmonthly + annual; Pro $15 monthly or $12/Doc Maker/month annually; Business $40 monthly or $33 annually; editors/viewers are free

hidden costsWorkspace admins and Doc Makers are billable; editors are free. Depending on admin settings, an editor who creates a doc/page or uses AI can become a billable Doc Maker after a 7- or 14-day grace/trial. Paid Packs are extra per Doc Maker per month with no annual option (for example, the Figma Pack is $10/Doc Maker/month). Annual-plan seat additions are prorated and billed monthly.

pricing sources checked 2026-08-13 · pricing source ↗

Questions about Coda

Can you build your own Coda with AI?

Partly. A doc with tables and buttons is buildable; Coda's editor, formula engine, packs/integrations, permissions, and team workflows make full parity difficult.

What does the Coda build prompt cover?

The prompt starts with this scope: Build a document with embedded typed tables, simple relation lookups and a small formula language. Add a button that performs one permission-checked mutation with a preview. Full-product capabilities excluded from the comparison include: formula language; packs; permissions. Follow the implementation plan and its prerequisites before expanding the build.

How do I use the prompt, AGENTS.md and agent skills?

Start with the Coda prerequisites and stack, then copy the prompt into your coding agent. Save the project rules as AGENTS.md in the project root. Linked skills are optional packages or source instructions for specific tasks; review their current contents and install only those matching the chosen stack. A skill does not supply API credentials or verify the finished app.

How long will this Coda project take?

The catalogue estimate is multi-day for the limited scope. Setup, integration approvals, debugging, deployment and ongoing maintenance can add time. This is an estimate, not a delivery guarantee.

What would I give up by replacing Coda?

formula language; packs; permissions; automations; templates; collaboration; doc-app UX. They pay because docs become tools that teammates can understand and maintain.

What price is this guide comparing against?

The recorded Pro Doc Maker plan is $12/mo per seat (monthly per Doc Maker), checked 2026-07-30. Check the linked pricing source before buying. Building your own also has hosting, API and maintenance costs; the recorded amount is not a guaranteed saving.

What can I use instead of building Coda?

Fibery Free: Coda for ten people, with relational docs and 250 automations before the bill exists. Superhuman Docs Free: Coda is now Superhuman Docs; the free plan still has collaborative docs, connected tables, forms, formulas, and automations. Check each option's license, hosting needs and feature limits.

Every week, more subscriptions die.

New verdicts, new prompts, the week's most-doomed apps.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

last week:100 Questions · KINDA1of10 · KINDA1Password · KINDA+1090 more

free forever · no scanner spam · the prompt stays on the site, the deaths come to you

$weekly: what got a verdict, what died.