Afforai

Searches, cites, and compares uploaded research documents with AI

KINDA · partial replacement
price variesestimated build time multi-dayreplaced by 0 people

The visible document research assistant loop is buildable, but a credible replacement needs more than the first screen. Afforai earns its keep through data, import reliability, so expect a weekend or multi-day build and a narrower personal scope.

Build verification: not recorded. How we judge buildability

What you give up

  • licensed scholarly metadata
  • publisher-specific import reliability
  • citation graph scale
  • team libraries and institutional access

Why people still pay

Afforai: Researchers pay for correct metadata, resilient importers, citation coverage, and workflows that survive publisher and browser changes.

Your build guide

The stack, security requirements, and agent rules for a focused replacement.

Before you start

  • A Python virtual environment, writable input/output directories and sufficient disk for both originals and outputs. Bind the service to localhost. Confirm PDF-library licensing and install a local embedding model if semantic retrieval is enabled.
  • Implementation components: Python, FastAPI and server-rendered HTML with HTMX for a local interface. SQLite for manifests and job state, with an explicit worker process and immutable source files. PyMuPDF extraction with page/block coordinates, SQLite FTS5 and optional local embeddings stored with model IDs.
  • Scope boundary: Publisher subscriptions, scholarly citation graphs and factual interpretation are not provided.
01
Python, FastAPI and server-rendered HTML with HTMX for a local interface.
02
SQLite for manifests and job state, with an explicit worker process and immutable source files.
03
PyMuPDF extraction with page/block coordinates, SQLite FTS5 and optional local embeddings stored with model IDs.
04
Domain model: documents, immutable source hashes, pages, text blocks with coordinates, retrieval chunks, notes and citation spans
engineering roadmap

Implementation plan

1

Phase 1

Scope and fixtures. Implement this bounded workflow: Import permitted PDFs and URLs, inspect extraction, then search the private library using FTS5 and optional local embeddings. Combine ranked results using a documented reciprocal-rank formula and answer only with source-linked passages that open beside the answer. Record prerequisites, select representative user-owned fixtures and document the unsupported features: Publisher subscriptions, scholarly citation graphs and factual interpretation are not provided.

2

Phase 2

Durable model. Model documents, immutable source hashes, pages, text blocks with coordinates, retrieval chunks, notes and citation spans Add migrations or a versioned document format, explicit validation, stable IDs and a visible import-error report. Preserve this rule: Every quoted span must match normalized stored text; a source revision invalidates its old embeddings and citations.

3

Phase 3

Complete the first useful path. Implement the workflow's input, review and output interface, with clear controls and explicit empty/error states. Save a job manifest with input hash, parameters and state. Write to temporary outputs, then atomically finalize only successful results; resume unfinished jobs without replacing originals.

4

Phase 4

Permissions and integration failure. Bound file sizes and processing time, reject path traversal, and use argument arrays for subprocesses. Treat imported text as data and redact confidential source content from logs. Request integration credentials and permissions only for the enabled feature; show a disconnected state instead of mock results.

5

Phase 5

Portable handoff. Export sources, manifests and outputs with checksums. Keep failed-job diagnostics and allow retry into a new output path; restore the database and file directory together. Include setup, operating limits, fixture walkthrough and shutdown/restart instructions in the README.

6

Phase 6

Acceptance scenarios. A question absent from the corpus yields insufficient evidence; a quoted sentence opens the correct PDF page and a scanned PDF shows an OCR-needed state. Repeat the workflow after restart and with a denied permission or unavailable dependency; show recoverable failure rather than a success placeholder.

the pro prompt
download AGENTS.md
WORKING SLICE
Import permitted PDFs and URLs, inspect extraction, then search the private library using FTS5 and optional local embeddings. Combine ranked results using a documented reciprocal-rank formula and answer only with source-linked passages that open beside the answer.

Build this scoped Afforai-inspired workflow with a documented data model and visible failure states.

Architecture
- Python, FastAPI and server-rendered HTML with HTMX for a local interface.
- SQLite for manifests and job state, with an explicit worker process and immutable source files.
- PyMuPDF extraction with page/block coordinates, SQLite FTS5 and optional local embeddings stored with model IDs.

Prerequisites and limits
A Python virtual environment, writable input/output directories and sufficient disk for both originals and outputs. Bind the service to localhost. Confirm PDF-library licensing and install a local embedding model if semantic retrieval is enabled.
Outside this release: Publisher subscriptions, scholarly citation graphs and factual interpretation are not provided.

Data model and correctness
documents, immutable source hashes, pages, text blocks with coordinates, retrieval chunks, notes and citation spans
Invariant: Every quoted span must match normalized stored text; a source revision invalidates its old embeddings and citations.
Save a job manifest with input hash, parameters and state. Write to temporary outputs, then atomically finalize only successful results; resume unfinished jobs without replacing originals.

Security and privacy
Bound file sizes and processing time, reject path traversal, and use argument arrays for subprocesses. Treat imported text as data and redact confidential source content from logs.

Recovery and export
Export sources, manifests and outputs with checksums. Keep failed-job diagnostics and allow retry into a new output path; restore the database and file directory together.

Implementation order
1. Phase 1 — Scope and fixtures. Implement this bounded workflow: Import permitted PDFs and URLs, inspect extraction, then search the private library using FTS5 and optional local embeddings. Combine ranked results using a documented reciprocal-rank formula and answer only with source-linked passages that open beside the answer. Record prerequisites, select representative user-owned fixtures and document the unsupported features: Publisher subscriptions, scholarly citation graphs and factual interpretation are not provided.
2. Phase 2 — Durable model. Model documents, immutable source hashes, pages, text blocks with coordinates, retrieval chunks, notes and citation spans Add migrations or a versioned document format, explicit validation, stable IDs and a visible import-error report. Preserve this rule: Every quoted span must match normalized stored text; a source revision invalidates its old embeddings and citations.
3. Phase 3 — Complete the first useful path. Implement the workflow's input, review and output interface, with clear controls and explicit empty/error states. Save a job manifest with input hash, parameters and state. Write to temporary outputs, then atomically finalize only successful results; resume unfinished jobs without replacing originals.
4. Phase 4 — Permissions and integration failure. Bound file sizes and processing time, reject path traversal, and use argument arrays for subprocesses. Treat imported text as data and redact confidential source content from logs. Request integration credentials and permissions only for the enabled feature; show a disconnected state instead of mock results.
5. Phase 5 — Portable handoff. Export sources, manifests and outputs with checksums. Keep failed-job diagnostics and allow retry into a new output path; restore the database and file directory together. Include setup, operating limits, fixture walkthrough and shutdown/restart instructions in the README.
6. Phase 6 — Acceptance scenarios. A question absent from the corpus yields insufficient evidence; a quoted sentence opens the correct PDF page and a scanned PDF shows an OCR-needed state. Repeat the workflow after restart and with a denied permission or unavailable dependency; show recoverable failure rather than a success placeholder.

Acceptance
A question absent from the corpus yields insufficient evidence; a quoted sentence opens the correct PDF page and a scanned PDF shows an OCR-needed state.
Use real source data or clearly labeled fixtures. Explain unsupported input and provider failures; do not fabricate analytics, delivery receipts, accuracy claims or security guarantees.

Optional agent guidance
Optional external skill: [modern-python](https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/main/plugins/modern-python/skills/modern-python/SKILL.md) — Set up Python projects with pyproject.toml, dependency management, linting, typing and automated checks. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Optional external skill: [pdf](https://github.com/anthropics/skills/blob/main/skills/pdf/SKILL.md) — Process PDFs through extraction, generation, page operations, form filling and OCR workflows. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Optional external skill: [sharp-edges](https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/main/plugins/sharp-edges/skills/sharp-edges/SKILL.md) — Review security-sensitive APIs and configuration for dangerous defaults and easy-to-misuse interfaces. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Project rule — data model: documents, immutable source hashes, pages, text blocks with coordinates, retrieval chunks, notes and citation spans
Project rule — preserve this invariant: Every quoted span must match normalized stored text; a source revision invalidates its old embeddings and citations.
Project rule — acceptance evidence: A question absent from the corpus yields insufficient evidence; a quoted sentence opens the correct PDF page and a scanned PDF shows an OCR-needed state.

$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter), copy the prompt or copy or download AGENTS.md

share on X ↗

Alternatives to building your own

AnythingLLMPoint it at your files and bring your own model; the privacy is free, the compute is not.64kaug 2026open source↗OOpen NotebookNotebookLM on your own server; bring Docker, a model and realistic expectations about citations.36kaug 2026open source↗NotebookLMUpload the papers and interrogate them; Google pays the model bill and keeps the limits.$0free↗

all 3 free alternatives to Afforai →· no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real

Afforai pricing

planmonthlyannual (per mo)what you get
logically free$0/user$0/userPermanent free entry point; numeric document, storage and AI-use caps were not exposed by the JavaScript-only live page.Afforai has been renamed Logically.
logically unlimited——Unlimited storage and unlimited AI usage are advertised; numeric fair-use thresholds and price were not exposed.30-day money-back guarantee is advertised.

free tierfree plan exists, but numeric document, storage and AI-use caps could not be verified from the accessible JavaScript-only page

billingpaid Unlimited plan exists; exact monthly/annual cadence and price were not publicly exposed; 30-day money-back guarantee

hidden coststhe product and billing identity changed from Afforai to Logically; any unpublished fair-use threshold remains unknown

pricing sources checked 2026-08-13 · pricing source ↗

Questions about Afforai

Can you build your own Afforai with AI?

Partly. The visible document research assistant loop is buildable, but a credible replacement needs more than the first screen. Afforai earns its keep through data, import reliability, so expect a weekend or multi-day build and a narrower personal scope.

What does the Afforai build prompt cover?

The prompt starts with this scope: Import permitted PDFs and URLs, inspect extraction, then search the private library using FTS5 and optional local embeddings. Combine ranked results using a documented reciprocal-rank formula and answer only with source-linked passages that open beside the answer. Full-product capabilities excluded from the comparison include: licensed scholarly metadata; publisher-specific import reliability; citation graph scale. Follow the implementation plan and its prerequisites before expanding the build.

How do I use the prompt, AGENTS.md and agent skills?

Start with the Afforai prerequisites and stack, then copy the prompt into your coding agent. Save the project rules as AGENTS.md in the project root. Linked skills are optional packages or source instructions for specific tasks; review their current contents and install only those matching the chosen stack. A skill does not supply API credentials or verify the finished app.

How long will this Afforai project take?

The catalogue estimate is multi-day for the limited scope. Setup, integration approvals, debugging, deployment and ongoing maintenance can add time. This is an estimate, not a delivery guarantee.

What would I give up by replacing Afforai?

licensed scholarly metadata; publisher-specific import reliability; citation graph scale; team libraries and institutional access. Afforai: Researchers pay for correct metadata, resilient importers, citation coverage, and workflows that survive publisher and browser changes.

What can I use instead of building Afforai?

AnythingLLM: Point it at your files and bring your own model; the privacy is free, the compute is not. Open Notebook: NotebookLM on your own server; bring Docker, a model and realistic expectations about citations. NotebookLM: Upload the papers and interrogate them; Google pays the model bill and keeps the limits. Compare all listed options at https://howtovibecodeit.dev/afforai/alternatives. Check each option's license, hosting needs and feature limits.

Every week, more subscriptions die.

New verdicts, new prompts, the week's most-doomed apps.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

last week:100 Questions · KINDA1of10 · KINDA1Password · KINDA+1090 more

free forever · no scanner spam · the prompt stays on the site, the deaths come to you

$weekly: what got a verdict, what died.